Hurst did not delivered his mortuary letter to his son, indicating that he had hope to return.ħ. He had something to lose, in contrast to Lord Marsh, who was rich and alone, dying from advanced tuberculosis. in killing quickly and efficiently, instead of toying with their targets.Ħ. Later, if you accuse him of shooting you, he confirms that if it was him, he would've killed you in one shot (he was an elite marksman in the war). Another evidence is that Hurst was tracking Lord Marsh and captured him. Later, it is confirmed that there was a second marksman during the chase, the lord's corpse was killed by a clean shot, with no signs of struggle, while the indigent one died like an animal. That does not match the voice and behavior of Hurst. In the starting cinematic you can hear the voice of your predator, his good mood and happy whistling. In the final act, Hurst wasn't the one hunting you. He was a broken man with lots of bad days, and when he learned what the lords were doing in Whitechapel under the guise of charity, he sought justice in the only way the war taught him.ĥ. A caring father and husband, which had a best friend (according to the letters and evidence found in his home and basement). Soldiers are too dangerous to be tampered with, too risky for their "sport".Ĥ. Lord Marsh leaves that implied in his last dialog, that Hurst "was but one of the soldiers they rejected". Hurst was rejected by the program not because of his injuries, but because they avoided soldiers entirely. A letter obtained from Lord Marsh's house, addressed by one of his fellow hunter lords, contains a sarcastic message, explicitly mocking their "prey" under the makeup of the education program.ģ. It leads us to believe that they had in mind a standard of high ranked people within the program, that they considered to be a "worthy trophy".Ģ. All the S members of the Education Program are missing. The game gives you a few sneaky clues indicating how the lords were killing the poor:ġ. I tip my hat to the developers and I will attempt to do better on the later cases. Taken together, it seems more likely than I once thought that Lord Marsh was hunting these paupers for sport and used the Special Education Programme as a front to recruit their unsuspecting victims. Why was he in disguise when he was recruiting for the special education programme? Why did he take down the poster of the missing John Stowbridge and crumple it? Why was he so careful not to have anyone follow him? Also, I think I remember Lord Marsh seemed noticeably uncomfortable when the physician was mentioning his programme and said, "Let's close this topic."įinally, George Hurst's letter to his son does not seem to be the words of a madman, but a thoughtful farewell from a loving father. John Stowbridge was among the list and we know is missing. They were in an "S" group and were the only ones with dates next to them ("S" may stand for the "special job," but that's pure speculation). The "Selected Participants" for the Special Education Programme (the list of names) were selected for a "very promising event" in October. We know that Marsh and his buddies were avid hunters. After doing some research, there is evidence, albeit scant, that Lord Marsh (and his companions) were the killers. Let me first confess that I too made the wrong conclusion.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |